Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_13.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CUUG FASTA(n).Sequence=CUUG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:24
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.29, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.29, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.18, deficit -0.03, CutoffScore  68.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.22, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.27, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  67.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.13, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  68.94, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.71, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  91.90, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.04, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  89.14, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGUGU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.41, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.35, deficit  0.04, CutoffScore  67.99, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76094.1,  5 NTs,                 CAAUG,score      -4.26, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.01, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  38.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.10, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  83.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.05, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  58.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  23.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.29, deficit -0.01, CutoffScore  68.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.20, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.50, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  54.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.82, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  65.42, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.99, deficit -0.14, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAUGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.76, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  67.57, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.89, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUACA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.34, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
ACUAGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -7.71, deficit  2.19, CutoffScore  45.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.62, deficit  0.26, CutoffScore  34.11, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
ACUUGU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.40, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  74.03, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.36, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.27, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  67.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_28791.1,  6 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -3.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUAGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.42, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  40.99, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUCCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -3.55, deficit -0.17, CutoffScore  71.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_29966.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.51, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -8.04, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_89199.2,  5 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -4.77, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  50.00, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.20, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  93.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUAAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.03, deficit  3.27, CutoffScore  65.92, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.72, deficit  7.78, CutoffScore  22.03, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGAGAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.92, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  77.49, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_65313.1,  5 NTs,                CCUUUG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCCCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  30.91, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.65, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CUGACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  57.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  39.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -5.29, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  81.79, ed  1, 0 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
AGUUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.79, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  69.73, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
AGCGUU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_28791.1,  6 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -3.89, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUCUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.07, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  59.30, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.29, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGACAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.56, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.37, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.87, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.20, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACUGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_65313.1,  5 NTs,                CCUUUG,score      -5.58, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUACC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  59.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGGCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.73, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore  40.75, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UACGUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.55, deficit -0.05, CutoffScore  68.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCCCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.34, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  90.92, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUGUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.76, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.67, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.45, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  69.38, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUGGU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.94, deficit -0.30, CutoffScore  71.54, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GACAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.52, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.78, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.94, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  66.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.57, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  60.29, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUCAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.36, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  84.98, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.54, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  61.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGCUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.85, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  53.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUAUUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_86883.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.48, deficit  2.02, CutoffScore  78.77, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUGG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.95, deficit  3.01, CutoffScore  69.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
AUUUCU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.69, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  94.01, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUCAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.29, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  57.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUCUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GACAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.91, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  32.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.95, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  84.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.45, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  59.32, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GUGUUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.80, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUCAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  71.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GAUAAUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score      -9.22, deficit -1.18, CutoffScore  80.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -8.27, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  32.01, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUCAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -7.17, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  53.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
UGGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.28, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  34.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.61, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.59, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.95, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  84.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACCCGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.38, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.15, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGUGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.10, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  77.23, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGAUUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.83, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  54.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUUUUUA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.70, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore  70.87, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.20, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
CAAACAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  79.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  31.46, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.46, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.68, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  46.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.59, deficit -0.64, CutoffScore  43.63, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.00, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore  55.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGUACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.96, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  19.90, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  46.73, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGACG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  64.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCGAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -8.88, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  83.93, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUGAUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.86, deficit  1.62, CutoffScore  52.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score     -11.29, deficit  6.53, CutoffScore  23.85, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CAAAUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.61, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  26.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUUUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.46, CutoffScore  76.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUAGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -6.55, deficit  0.30, CutoffScore  65.99, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGCGAAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.97, deficit  2.61, CutoffScore  40.98, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.49, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGCGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -11.54, deficit  5.09, CutoffScore  46.40, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUUUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.47, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.17, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  36.46, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUCAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.29, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  55.10, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GGUAGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.77, deficit -0.63, CutoffScore  43.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAACCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.72, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  40.83, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAGCCA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -6.20, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  44.98, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.67, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  44.50, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUCUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.30, deficit  1.63, CutoffScore  51.29, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGCCCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -9.69, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  13.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGUUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.83, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  54.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCGAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  32.58, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CUUAAUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.72, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUCCGGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -11.86, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  27.13, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
UUAUCAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.66, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  27.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUCGUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -13.50, deficit  6.80, CutoffScore  26.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUUGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  34.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGAAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.77, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.87, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  32.38, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.55, deficit  1.11, CutoffScore  56.71, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.63, deficit  2.19, CutoffScore  45.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCUGCAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.16, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  93.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UACGAAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  52.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GUUAAGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -6.25, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.12, deficit  2.42, CutoffScore   9.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GUCCCAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -12.03, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore  52.63, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW                                 
CUGGACCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  6.48, CutoffScore  24.23, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GCAAAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  58.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGACGAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -7.59, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  44.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -8.70, deficit  3.27, CutoffScore  28.96, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CAAGAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -11.73, deficit  7.10, CutoffScore  37.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GCGGUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.97, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  34.56, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GAAUCCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.09, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore   6.95, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAGCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.76, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -9.15, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  37.54, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGCCGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.91, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  31.97, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGACUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.80, deficit  6.04, CutoffScore  25.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCGAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.32, deficit -0.41, CutoffScore  72.71, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAUGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  33.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCCUGUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.55, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  66.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUGAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.81, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  32.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.82, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore  35.62, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGAGGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -8.69, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  37.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGCAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -7.69, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  66.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAAAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.35, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  33.66, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAUACUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.45, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  11.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAUUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score     -10.60, deficit  5.81, CutoffScore   1.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GACAAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.21, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  24.17, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUGUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.44, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  68.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGACGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -6.02, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  49.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAACAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -8.44, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore  30.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGCGAACA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -8.96, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.28, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.36, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  47.65, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAGAAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.98, deficit  2.55, CutoffScore  41.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAAAAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.34, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.86, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCUUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -11.24, deficit  6.81, CutoffScore  18.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUUGUAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.07, deficit  2.81, CutoffScore  52.03, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CCUGAGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.51, deficit  5.34, CutoffScore  49.58, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -7.32, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  55.59, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GUGCAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -16.18, deficit  7.26, CutoffScore  20.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW                                 
GUCGAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score     -11.64, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore  28.48, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGAAAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.28, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore  39.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGAGGAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -8.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  46.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAUAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGUCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.46, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  44.55, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CCGAGAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -12.52, deficit  4.70, CutoffScore  22.11, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGGAAGUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -7.68, deficit  2.67, CutoffScore  50.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CUAAAACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.64, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  12.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCACAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -6.78, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  84.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACAACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.72, deficit  4.35, CutoffScore  10.95, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAUUACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -7.69, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  71.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCUCGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.84, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  23.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CAAUUCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -7.70, deficit  1.27, CutoffScore  43.28, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAGAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -10.90, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  12.16, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GGAUUUAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.04, deficit  4.66, CutoffScore  30.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCAAGGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.42, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  15.10, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCUUUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -10.94, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  18.39, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCUGGAGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -9.02, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  33.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUAUUGAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.44, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  10.72, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
AAAAAACAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.05, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  33.68, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUACAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  45.82, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UGUAAGUUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -5.84, deficit  0.27, CutoffScore  97.97, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUCCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.82, CutoffScore  21.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCAAGCUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.71, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  51.45, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACGAAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -7.29, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  46.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUCGUUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -10.19, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  34.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUUGAAACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -8.79, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  47.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUAAGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -12.18, deficit  7.90, CutoffScore  39.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -7.18, deficit  2.42, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGCGCGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -11.13, deficit  3.66, CutoffScore  16.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUCAAUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.53, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  48.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GUUAGGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.11, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  25.33, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACCCUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.22, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  17.07, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUUCUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  15.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAGAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.28, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  26.26, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUCUUUGUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.87, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  40.82, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCGUGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore   7.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCACAAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -6.19, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  48.97, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CAAGUUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -9.25, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CGAGGAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -11.57, deficit  6.56, CutoffScore  28.42, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CUCGAUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.08, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore  22.53, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCCAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -6.74, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAAAAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.16, deficit -0.59, CutoffScore  47.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGACAACCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.61, CutoffScore  12.11, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.83, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  26.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGGGCAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.66, deficit  2.31, CutoffScore  30.90, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GGAGCUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  39.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGUUUCGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -8.75, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  32.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUGGAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.31, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  45.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GAAGCGAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.51, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore  42.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGACAAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -8.54, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  38.31, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGACACGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -16.43, deficit  9.31, CutoffScore   6.43, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUACUAGCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.80, deficit  7.51, CutoffScore  18.69, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUCAGAUGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.76, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore   9.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -10.63, deficit  4.92, CutoffScore  27.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CAAACAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.80, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  44.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CGUUAUGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.15, deficit  7.78, CutoffScore   8.11, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUAACUGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.47, deficit  5.32, CutoffScore   4.84, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACCUCGGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -12.16, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  11.13, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCAAAAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.42, deficit  7.79, CutoffScore  15.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCUUCCCGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score     -12.18, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  11.42, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGCAACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.40, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore  27.11, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCCAGCACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.81, deficit  6.52, CutoffScore   6.58, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAACCCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score      -6.77, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  62.01, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCCCAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.68, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  25.44, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAGCUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score      -9.55, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  31.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCAAAUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.60, deficit  2.86, CutoffScore  13.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUUUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -13.14, deficit  7.43, CutoffScore  10.56, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CGCCCGCGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -14.97, deficit  6.70, CutoffScore  12.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
CUUCCAGUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.70, deficit  5.88, CutoffScore  34.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUAAAAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.32, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  26.45, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -9.97, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  31.70, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GUAAAAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.95, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore  29.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CACUUUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.78, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore   9.17, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAUUUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.68, deficit  5.30, CutoffScore   7.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUAUUUUAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.24, deficit  5.95, CutoffScore  27.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAUAAAACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.11, deficit  6.03, CutoffScore  31.70, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAAAUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -16.22, deficit  6.92, CutoffScore   3.70, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CGGAAUAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.76, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  16.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAUUGUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.34, deficit  4.97, CutoffScore  28.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAAGAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -12.86, deficit  7.84, CutoffScore   3.97, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CGAGGAAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -9.97, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  20.49, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CAGGAAAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.84, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  22.67, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CUUUUGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.34, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  10.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAACACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -12.44, deficit  6.86, CutoffScore  16.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUUGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.54, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  30.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAUCUUAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.23, deficit  3.85, CutoffScore  16.51, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAAUUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.77, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore   4.79, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
ACGUUCGAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score      -7.55, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  60.76, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CAAUCGAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  21.26, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
AUAAAUUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -13.76, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore   2.05, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GACAAUAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.45, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  18.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUUCGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.29, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  19.92, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCGUCGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.85, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  42.17, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUGCGUCCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.05, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore  25.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGUGAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.65, deficit  4.33, CutoffScore  30.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUUCAAAAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.23, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  37.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUCAAGUGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.30, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore   3.81, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCUGUGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -13.94, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  15.92, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AACGCAAAUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.85, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  10.74, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCCAAAGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.88, deficit  8.81, CutoffScore  23.62, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UUUUUUGCGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.48, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  29.98, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -16.46, deficit  8.38, CutoffScore  12.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAACGAUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.64, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  14.54, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AGUCAUGAGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -16.44, deficit  9.97, CutoffScore   2.79, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CGCAAAAAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.68, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore   6.95, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGUAAUUCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -16.39, deficit  7.38, CutoffScore   9.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGUUAAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -10.41, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  48.76, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGUAAUUUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.69, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  24.79, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCUCCAAAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.38, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  18.65, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UGAUUCCAGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.86, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  23.98, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGGCAAUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.35, deficit  4.62, CutoffScore  10.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAAGUUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.76, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore   0.48, ed  5, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUGUGGUUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.72, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore  17.81, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAGAUGGCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -15.16, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore  11.13, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUGUGCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -11.78, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore   6.73, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CCGUUUAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.87, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore  35.00, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAAAUAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.46, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  22.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGUAAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -13.39, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  14.85, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUAAAAAAUAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.31, deficit  2.31, CutoffScore  21.00, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAGAGGAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.21, deficit  4.44, CutoffScore  42.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGUUUUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.20, deficit  3.58, CutoffScore  21.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGCUGCAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.69, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  12.94, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
AGAUUAAGAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.13, deficit  8.35, CutoffScore  13.26, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
UGGCGGGAAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.28, deficit  5.29, CutoffScore  20.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCCGCAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.16, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  12.65, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CGUUUUGAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score      -9.05, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  40.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUUAUAAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -12.56, deficit  3.01, CutoffScore  24.54, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGAGCCCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.88, deficit  6.01, CutoffScore  16.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGGUGUUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -10.89, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  34.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAGUGAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.05, deficit  4.07, CutoffScore  27.45, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAUUUUGUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.23, deficit  4.42, CutoffScore  21.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAAUAGUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -15.52, deficit  5.26, CutoffScore  12.85, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CAAAUUGAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.29, deficit  5.00, CutoffScore  15.05, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAAAGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  39.07, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUUCUGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.46, deficit  5.08, CutoffScore   8.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUCAAAAGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.01, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  14.42, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAAGGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.82, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore   5.26, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UACUCAAACAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -14.36, deficit  9.29, CutoffScore  30.27, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCAAAGACGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -16.45, deficit  9.37, CutoffScore   6.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAGUUUUCGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -11.64, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  13.99, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGGAGGUUCAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -15.14, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  11.23, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
UUUGUUUAAAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -14.34, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  13.37, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACGCGUCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -17.00, deficit  9.88, CutoffScore  18.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGGCUGAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.51, deficit  5.74, CutoffScore   2.33, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAACAAACUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -9.61, deficit  2.75, CutoffScore  28.16, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAAUAUUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -13.14, deficit  7.68, CutoffScore   1.58, ed  6, 4 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCAUGAGAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.91, deficit  5.17, CutoffScore  37.38, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGCUGCGAUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.89, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  26.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UUACUGCGUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -17.30, deficit  8.53, CutoffScore   3.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUGUGACAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.06, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore   8.49, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAAUUCAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -10.86, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  53.67, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUUGGGUUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -15.16, deficit  5.72, CutoffScore  11.14, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CUGCGAUGUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -16.82, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore   6.63, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUUUAAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.55, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  25.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAAGAAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.12, deficit  6.26, CutoffScore   6.67, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAACAUAUUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.92, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore   5.41, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAGCGCAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -14.73, deficit  5.20, CutoffScore  20.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUCUGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -17.38, deficit  7.83, CutoffScore  13.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUCAAAUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.97, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore   9.02, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGGGGAAGAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -18.90, deficit 10.28, CutoffScore   0.05, ed  5, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GUAACGGACUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.11, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  10.24, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAACAAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.20, deficit  2.97, CutoffScore   0.04, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUAAAAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.00, deficit  5.93, CutoffScore  23.03, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CAACGCAGAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31581.6, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -14.74, deficit  7.59, CutoffScore   2.04, ed  5, 4 cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F                 
CAAAUGUUUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.28, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  31.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CCAGAAAACCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.60, deficit  4.45, CutoffScore   3.64, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAAACGGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -18.72, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore   3.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUACCGUGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.07, deficit  7.34, CutoffScore   3.29, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UUUUAAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.63, deficit  6.38, CutoffScore   3.39, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGCAUCCAGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 11 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -17.39, deficit  8.09, CutoffScore   0.34, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAACACAUACAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.45, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  22.09, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUAGACUACUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07903.1, 13 NTs,       GUAUUGCAGUACCUC,score     -16.45, deficit  7.28, CutoffScore   3.59, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GACUGAGAAGACGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81205.3, 14 NTs,        CACUGAGACACGGG,score     -18.27, deficit 12.49, CutoffScore   6.17, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F             
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 96.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 88.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 42.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 16.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 86.0000	 76.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 94.0000	 38.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 84.0000	 48.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 58.0000	 20.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 30.0000	  4.0000
[9 9]	 96.0000	 14.0000	  4.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  46 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  83 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 112 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 113 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 276 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 295 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 296 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 327 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 366 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 383 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 390 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 400 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 446 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 457 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 464 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 472 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 496 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 521 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 543 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 573 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 600 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 623 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 649 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 670 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 688 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 748 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 761 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 794 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 816 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 827 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 902 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 950 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 955 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 981 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1295 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1391 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1406 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1521 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1547 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 2.4970%
Number of models giving false positives is 236 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.56
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     1.10
